Understanding Order KPIs
Introduction
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) provide critical insights into your organization's order management performance. ARMOR's Order Management system tracks multiple metrics that help administrators monitor order volume, approval efficiency, notification success rates, and vendor utilization. Understanding these KPIs enables data-driven decision-making, helps identify process bottlenecks, and ensures your order management workflow operates efficiently.
This comprehensive guide covers all order-related KPIs available in ARMOR, including how they're calculated, what they indicate about system health, and how to interpret them for operational improvements. It's important to note that ARMOR's Order Management system focuses on order creation, approval, and vendor notification—it does not track fulfillment status, delivery times, or completion of work by vendors.
KPI Overview Table
| KPI Category | Metrics Included | Primary Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Volume Metrics | Total orders, orders per day/week/month, order type distribution | Understanding workload, capacity planning, trend analysis |
| Status Metrics | Pending count, approved count, rejected count, sent count, failed count | Workflow health, bottleneck identification, process efficiency |
| Approval Metrics | Approval rate, rejection rate, average approval time, pending approval age | Approval process efficiency, approver responsiveness, policy compliance |
| Notification Metrics | Send success rate, failed notification count, notification failure reasons | Email delivery health, vendor contact validation, system reliability |
| Vendor Metrics | Orders per vendor, vendor utilization percentage, vendor assignment success | Vendor relationship management, workload distribution, automation effectiveness |
Total Orders KPI
The Total Orders KPI represents the complete count of orders created in your ARMOR system over a specified time period. This foundational metric provides context for all other KPIs and helps administrators understand overall order management workload.
Calculation Method
Total Orders = COUNT(all orders where creation_date within time period)
This includes orders in all statuses: Pending, Approved, Rejected, Sent, Failed, and Cancelled. The metric counts each order once regardless of subsequent status changes.
Time Period Variations
| Time Period | Use Case | Interpretation Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Daily | Monitoring real-time workload; identifying unusual activity spikes | High day-to-day variability is normal; look for multi-day trends |
| Weekly | Understanding operational patterns; comparing week-over-week performance | Business cycles may show consistent weekly patterns (e.g., Monday spikes) |
| Monthly | Strategic planning; budget forecasting; seasonal analysis | Most stable period for trend analysis; reduces day-to-day noise |
| Quarterly | Long-term trend identification; annual planning; resource allocation | Reveals seasonal patterns; useful for comparing year-over-year growth |
| Annual | Executive reporting; multi-year trend analysis; strategic planning | Highest-level view; smooths out seasonal variations |
What Total Orders Tells You
- Workload Volume: Indicates overall demand on order management system and staff
- Growth Trajectory: Increasing totals suggest growing asset portfolio or increased maintenance activity
- Seasonal Patterns: Recurring annual patterns (e.g., higher in summer for HVAC, lower during holidays)
- System Utilization: Helps assess whether system capacity is adequate for current/projected volumes
- Resource Planning: Informs staffing needs for order processing and approval workflows
Example Interpretation
Data: October 2024: 450 orders | October 2023: 380 orders | Average monthly orders (2024): 425
Interpretation: October 2024 shows 18% year-over-year growth and is slightly above the 2024 monthly average. This suggests healthy growth in order activity, possibly driven by asset portfolio expansion or increased maintenance frequency. The slight above-average October performance may indicate pre-winter maintenance preparation for equipment.
Pending Orders Count
The Pending Orders Count KPI tracks orders awaiting approval. This metric is critical for identifying approval bottlenecks and ensuring timely order processing.
Calculation Method
Pending Orders Count = COUNT(orders where current_status = 'Pending')
This is a point-in-time metric representing the current count of orders in pending status, not a historical count over a time period.
Key Considerations
| Aspect | Details | Action Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy Range | Depends on organization size and order volume; typically 5-15% of monthly order volume | If pending count exceeds 20% of monthly average, investigate approval delays |
| Age Distribution | Not just total count matters, but how long orders have been pending | Orders pending >72 hours should be reviewed for approval issues |
| Approver Workload | High pending count may indicate approver capacity constraints | Consider additional approvers or approval delegation if consistently high |
| Order Type Split | Parts vs. Service orders may have different approval patterns | Analyze pending count by order type to identify specific bottlenecks |
Common Causes of High Pending Count
- Approver Availability: Approver on vacation, out sick, or otherwise unavailable to review orders
- Approval Notification Issues: Approver not receiving email notifications about pending orders
- Complexity Delays: Orders require additional information or clarification before approval decision
- Policy Ambiguity: Unclear approval criteria causing approver hesitation
- Volume Spike: Temporary increase in order creation overwhelming normal approval capacity
- Workflow Misconfiguration: Orders incorrectly routed to wrong approver or approval not required but set
Monitoring Best Practices
- Daily Check: Review pending count each business day to catch approval delays early
- Age Analysis: Sort pending orders by creation date; prioritize oldest orders for investigation
- Approver Communication: If pending count grows, proactively contact approvers to ensure awareness
- Trend Tracking: Monitor whether pending count is growing, shrinking, or stable over time
- Backup Planning: Establish backup approval processes for when primary approvers are unavailable
Approval Rate KPI
The Approval Rate KPI measures the percentage of orders that are approved versus rejected. This metric provides insights into order quality, policy effectiveness, and approval process health.
Calculation Method
Approval Rate = (Approved Orders ÷ Total Orders with Approval Decision) × 100
Where Total Orders with Approval Decision = Approved Orders + Rejected Orders
Note: Pending orders and cancelled orders are excluded from this calculation as they haven't received approval decisions.
Interpreting Approval Rates
| Approval Rate | Interpretation | Recommended Actions |
|---|---|---|
| 95-100% | Excellent: Orders are high quality and well-justified; approval process functioning smoothly | Maintain current practices; consider if approval step is necessary for all order types |
| 85-94% | Good: Most orders approved but some rejections occurring; normal operational range | Review rejected orders for common patterns; provide feedback to order creators |
| 70-84% | Moderate: Significant rejection rate; potential issues with order creation or approval criteria | Analyze rejection reasons; clarify approval policies; provide order creator training |
| <70% | Concerning: High rejection rate indicates systemic issues requiring immediate attention | Urgent review of approval criteria, order creation process, and communication gaps |
Common Rejection Reasons
- Insufficient Information: Order description doesn't provide enough detail for approval decision
- Budget Constraints: Requested work exceeds available budget or requires additional authorization
- Wrong Vendor: Approver believes different vendor should be used for the work
- Duplicate Order: Order duplicates existing order or recently completed work
- Premature Request: Order submitted before proper diagnostic or assessment completed
- Policy Violation: Order doesn't comply with organizational procurement or maintenance policies
- Deferred Maintenance: Work can be delayed to future period for budget or operational reasons
Improving Approval Rates
| Strategy | Implementation | Expected Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Order Creator Training | Provide clear guidelines on order description requirements, photo standards, and justification expectations | Reduce rejections due to insufficient information by 40-60% |
| Approval Criteria Documentation | Document and communicate specific approval criteria; make criteria accessible during order creation | Reduce policy-related rejections by 30-50% |
| Pre-Approval Consultation | For high-value or complex orders, encourage creators to consult approver before submission | Reduce rejections on complex orders by 50-70% |
| Order Templates | Create templates for common order types with pre-filled information and guidance | Reduce rejections on routine orders by 30-40% |
| Rejection Feedback Loop | Ensure approvers provide detailed rejection reasons; share learnings with order creators | Continuous improvement; gradual reduction in repeat rejection types |
Send Success Rate KPI
The Send Success Rate KPI measures the percentage of approved orders that are successfully sent to vendors via email notification. This metric is critical for ensuring vendors receive orders and can begin work.
Calculation Method
Send Success Rate = (Successfully Sent Orders ÷ Total Approved Orders) × 100
Where:
- Successfully Sent Orders = Orders with status = 'Sent'
- Total Approved Orders = Approved Orders + Sent Orders + Failed Orders
Target Benchmarks
| Send Success Rate | System Health | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| 98-100% | Excellent: Vendor contact information well-maintained; notification system reliable | Continue standard vendor profile maintenance practices |
| 95-97% | Good: Minor occasional failures; within acceptable operational range | Monitor failed notifications; address vendor contact issues as they arise |
| 90-94% | Fair: Notable failure rate requiring attention; potential vendor profile issues | Review and update vendor contact information; investigate notification service health |
| <90% | Poor: Significant failures impacting vendor communication; urgent action needed | Immediate vendor contact audit; escalate notification service issues to IT |
Common Causes of Failed Notifications
| Failure Cause | Symptoms | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| Invalid Email Address | Email bounce messages; immediate send failure | Update vendor profile with correct email address; verify with vendor |
| Email Server Issues | Multiple vendors affected simultaneously; intermittent failures | Check ARMOR notification service status; contact support if persistent |
| Vendor Email Full/Disabled | Email accepted but delivery fails; quota exceeded messages | Contact vendor to resolve their email issues; use alternate contact if available |
| Spam Filtering | Email appears sent but vendor doesn't receive; no bounce message | Request vendor whitelist ARMOR email domain; verify spam folder |
| Network Issues | Timeout errors; delayed failures; affects multiple orders | Check network connectivity; retry sending after network restoration |
| Missing Email Address | Immediate failure with missing contact information error | Add email address to vendor profile before attempting send |
Monitoring and Improvement
- Daily Failed Order Review: Check for failed notifications each day; retry or address issues promptly
- Quarterly Vendor Contact Audit: Verify all vendor email addresses are current and valid
- Notification Service Monitoring: Track notification service uptime and performance metrics
- Vendor Communication: Ensure vendors know to expect email notifications and check spam folders
- Retry Mechanisms: Implement automatic retry for transient failures; manual retry for persistent issues
- Alternative Contact Methods: Maintain phone numbers or alternate emails for critical vendors
Failed Notification Count
The Failed Notification Count KPI tracks the absolute number of orders that failed to send to vendors. While related to Send Success Rate, the absolute count provides different insights about system health and workload.
Calculation Method
Failed Notification Count = COUNT(orders where status = 'Failed' AND failure_date within time period)
Why Absolute Count Matters
Send Success Rate percentage can mask the scale of problems. For example:
- Scenario A: 100 orders, 2 failures = 98% success rate, 2 failed notifications
- Scenario B: 1000 orders, 20 failures = 98% success rate, 20 failed notifications
Both scenarios have the same success rate, but Scenario B requires significantly more administrative effort to resolve 10x more failed notifications. The absolute count helps administrators understand the actual workload impact.
Failure Count Management
| Daily Failed Count | Workload Impact | Management Approach |
|---|---|---|
| 0-1 | Minimal: Occasional failures easily handled in normal workflow | Address as part of routine daily order review |
| 2-5 | Low: Manageable with standard processes; monitor for patterns | Daily review of failures; track if specific vendors or issues recurring |
| 6-10 | Moderate: Requires dedicated time for resolution; indicates potential systemic issue | Prioritized failure investigation; may require vendor contact updates or IT support |
| >10 | High: Significant administrative burden; likely systemic issue requiring urgent attention | Escalate to IT for notification service investigation; suspend orders if critical |
Failure Triage and Resolution Priority
- Critical Orders First: Emergency or safety-related orders should be resolved immediately (phone vendor if needed)
- High-Value Orders: Orders above certain dollar threshold or involving critical assets get priority
- Oldest Failures: Address long-standing failures before recent ones to prevent SLA violations
- Bulk Issues: If multiple failures have same cause (e.g., email service outage), resolve root cause first
- Individual Issues: Address one-off failures (e.g., typo in email) after resolving bulk issues
Order Status Breakdown
The Order Status Breakdown KPI provides a comprehensive view of order distribution across all status categories. This multi-dimensional metric helps administrators understand overall system health and identify workflow issues.
Status Categories
| Status | Meaning | Typical Percentage | Concern Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pending | Awaiting approval decision | 5-15% of monthly total | >20% suggests approval bottleneck |
| Approved | Approved but not yet sent to vendor | 1-5% of monthly total | >10% suggests sending delay issues |
| Rejected | Not approved; will not be sent to vendor | 2-10% of monthly total | >15% suggests order quality issues |
| Sent | Successfully notified to vendor | 70-85% of monthly total | <60% suggests workflow problems |
| Failed | Attempted send to vendor failed | 1-5% of monthly total | >10% suggests contact data or system issues |
| Cancelled | Order cancelled before completion | 2-8% of monthly total | >15% may indicate premature order creation |
Healthy Status Distribution Example
Organization with 500 monthly orders:
- Pending: 50 orders (10%)
- Approved: 15 orders (3%)
- Rejected: 25 orders (5%)
- Sent: 390 orders (78%)
- Failed: 10 orders (2%)
- Cancelled: 10 orders (2%)
Analysis: This distribution is healthy. Most orders (78%) successfully sent to vendors, rejection rate is low (5%), pending queue is manageable (10%), and failures are minimal (2%). The organization should continue current practices while monitoring for changes in these percentages.
Concerning Status Distribution Example
Organization with 500 monthly orders:
- Pending: 125 orders (25%)
- Approved: 50 orders (10%)
- Rejected: 75 orders (15%)
- Sent: 225 orders (45%)
- Failed: 20 orders (4%)
- Cancelled: 5 orders (1%)
Analysis: This distribution indicates multiple issues: high pending percentage suggests approval bottlenecks, elevated approved-not-sent percentage indicates sending delays, high rejection rate suggests order quality or policy clarity problems, and low sent percentage means vendors aren't receiving orders promptly. Immediate action needed on approval workflow, order creator training, and sending process investigation.
Order Type Distribution
The Order Type Distribution KPI breaks down orders by type: Parts Orders vs. Service Orders. This metric helps administrators understand maintenance patterns and resource allocation needs.
Calculation Method
Parts Order Percentage = (Parts Orders ÷ Total Orders) × 100
Service Order Percentage = (Service Orders ÷ Total Orders) × 100
Distribution Patterns and Implications
| Distribution Pattern | Typical Scenarios | Management Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Heavy Parts (70-80% Parts) | Organizations with in-house maintenance staff; vendors primarily supply parts | Focus on parts inventory optimization; vendor part availability important |
| Balanced (45-55% each) | Mixed maintenance approach; combination of internal staff and vendor services | Maintain relationships with both parts suppliers and service vendors |
| Heavy Service (70-80% Service) | Organizations outsourcing most maintenance; limited internal staff | Focus on vendor service quality and capacity; approval for services may be more critical |
| Extreme Parts (>85% Parts) | Highly specialized internal team; vendors only for parts supply | Consider parts vendor consolidation; optimize ordering processes |
| Extreme Service (>85% Service) | Fully outsourced maintenance model; minimal internal maintenance capability | Ensure sufficient vendor capacity; develop strong vendor relationships |
Seasonal Variations in Order Type
Order type distribution may vary seasonally based on equipment and climate:
- Summer: Higher service orders for HVAC maintenance and cooling equipment
- Winter: Increased service orders for heating systems and generator maintenance
- Spring/Fall: More parts orders as organizations perform preventive maintenance and prepare for seasonal changes
- Budget Cycle: Parts orders may spike at fiscal year-end to utilize remaining budget
Vendor Utilization Metrics
Vendor utilization metrics track how orders are distributed across your vendor portfolio. These metrics help ensure balanced vendor relationships and identify over-reliance on specific vendors.
Key Vendor Metrics
| Metric | Calculation | What It Reveals |
|---|---|---|
| Orders Per Vendor | COUNT(orders) grouped by vendor | Absolute workload assigned to each vendor |
| Vendor Utilization % | (Vendor's Orders ÷ Total Orders) × 100 | Vendor's share of total order volume; indicates concentration |
| Active Vendor Count | COUNT(distinct vendors receiving orders in period) | Breadth of vendor usage; diversification level |
| Vendor Assignment Success | (Auto-assigned Orders ÷ Total Orders) × 100 | Effectiveness of automation rules at selecting vendors |
| Manual Selection Rate | (Manually Selected Orders ÷ Total Orders) × 100 | How often automation is overridden; may indicate rule gaps |
Vendor Concentration Analysis
Top Vendor Concentration: Percentage of orders handled by top 3 vendors
| Concentration Level | Interpretation | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| 30-50% | Good diversification: Risk spread across multiple vendors; no single point of failure | Maintain current vendor portfolio; continue balanced approach |
| 51-70% | Moderate concentration: Some vendor dependence but manageable | Monitor top vendors for capacity and performance; consider developing alternates |
| 71-85% | High concentration: Significant dependence on few vendors; risk exposure | Actively develop additional vendor relationships to reduce concentration |
| >85% | Excessive concentration: Vulnerability to vendor disruption; limited alternatives | Urgent vendor diversification needed; consider vendor capacity constraints |
Example Vendor Utilization Report
Monthly Order Volume: 500 orders
Vendor Orders Utilization % ABC Mechanical 125 25% XYZ Equipment Services 100 20% Parts Pro Supply 80 16% CAT Authorized Dealer 60 12% Cummins Service 50 10% HVAC Specialists Inc 40 8% Others (4 vendors) 45 9% Analysis: Top 3 vendors handle 61% of orders (moderate concentration). Total of 10 active vendors provides reasonable diversification. ABC Mechanical at 25% is largest vendor but not overly dominant. Distribution appears healthy with good balance across vendor portfolio.
Time-to-Approval Metrics
Time-to-approval metrics measure how quickly orders move through the approval process. These metrics help identify approval workflow efficiency and bottlenecks.
Key Time Metrics
| Metric | Calculation | Benchmark Target |
|---|---|---|
| Average Time to Approval | AVG(approval_timestamp - creation_timestamp) for approved orders | <24 hours for routine orders; <4 hours for urgent orders |
| Median Time to Approval | MEDIAN(approval_timestamp - creation_timestamp) | Often lower than average; indicates typical approval speed |
| Pending Order Age | Current_timestamp - creation_timestamp for orders still pending | Max age should be <72 hours; investigate orders older than this |
| Approval SLA Compliance | (Orders approved within SLA ÷ Total approved orders) × 100 | >95% compliance with defined SLA (e.g., 24-hour approval) |
Factors Affecting Approval Time
- Order Complexity: High-value or complex orders naturally take longer to approve
- Approver Availability: Approval times slower when approver has limited availability
- Order Quality: Well-documented orders with clear descriptions approve faster
- Approval Threshold: Orders above certain dollar amounts may require additional review
- Time of Submission: Orders submitted at end of day or before weekends may wait longer
- Notification Delivery: Delayed approval notifications slow the process
Improving Approval Times
- Clear Documentation Standards: Provide templates and guidelines for order descriptions to reduce approver clarification needs
- Approval Delegation: Empower backup approvers during primary approver absences
- Automated Reminders: Send reminder notifications for pending approvals after 24-48 hours
- Mobile Approval: Enable approvers to review and approve orders from mobile devices
- Tiered Approval: Route low-value routine orders to faster approval track
- Pre-Approved Categories: For recurring routine orders, consider pre-approval or auto-approval within limits
System Limitations: What ARMOR Does NOT Track
It's critical to understand that ARMOR's Order Management system tracks orders through creation, approval, and vendor notification—but does not track fulfillment or completion status. This limitation affects what KPIs are available and how to interpret metrics.
Not Tracked in ARMOR Order Management
| Not Available | Why It Matters | Alternative Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor Fulfillment Status | Cannot track if vendor has started work, completed work, or delivered parts | Maintain separate fulfillment tracking system or spreadsheet |
| Time to Completion | Cannot measure how long vendors take to complete work after receiving order | Manual tracking of completion dates; vendor performance logs |
| Parts Delivery Dates | Cannot track when ordered parts arrive at site | Receiving logs; inventory system integration |
| Vendor Response Time | Cannot track how quickly vendor acknowledges or responds to order | Manual logging of vendor responses; email tracking |
| Work Quality Ratings | Cannot capture post-completion satisfaction or quality metrics | Separate vendor performance evaluation system |
| Actual Costs | Cannot track final invoice amounts or compare to estimated costs | Accounting system integration; invoice tracking |
Implications for KPI Interpretation
Because fulfillment isn't tracked, ARMOR order KPIs focus on:
- Internal Process Efficiency: How well your organization creates, approves, and communicates orders
- System Health: Whether orders are flowing through the workflow as expected
- Communication Success: Whether vendors are successfully notified about work requests
KPIs do NOT measure:
- Vendor service quality or speed
- Whether work is actually completed
- Overall maintenance effectiveness
- Total cost of work performed
A high "send success rate" means orders are successfully communicated to vendors—it does NOT mean the work is being completed satisfactorily. Administrators must track fulfillment separately if that data is needed.
Dashboard and Reporting Access
ARMOR provides multiple ways to access order KPIs and metrics:
Built-in Reporting Features
- Order Dashboard: Real-time view of current order status breakdown and pending counts
- Analytics Tab: Historical trends, approval rates, vendor utilization charts
- Order List Filters: Filter and count orders by status, type, date range, vendor
- Vendor Performance View: Orders per vendor, send success rates by vendor
- Export Functions: Download order data to Excel/CSV for custom analysis
Creating Custom KPI Reports
For KPIs not built into ARMOR dashboards:
- Export Order Data: Download complete order list with all fields
- Calculate Metrics in Excel: Use pivot tables and formulas to calculate custom KPIs
- Create Visualizations: Build charts and graphs to visualize trends
- Schedule Regular Exports: Set reminders to export data monthly/quarterly for trend analysis
- Share with Stakeholders: Distribute custom reports to management and relevant teams
Using KPIs for Continuous Improvement
KPIs are most valuable when used to drive operational improvements:
Monthly KPI Review Process
- Collect Current Month Data: Gather all relevant KPIs for the completed month
- Compare to Baselines: Compare current metrics to historical averages and targets
- Identify Trends: Look for metrics improving, declining, or remaining stable
- Investigate Anomalies: Dig into any unusual spikes, drops, or patterns
- Document Insights: Record findings, root causes, and contributing factors
- Develop Action Plans: Create specific actions to address declining metrics or leverage improvements
- Implement Changes: Execute action plans; adjust processes, provide training, or modify rules
- Monitor Impact: Track whether changes result in expected KPI improvements
KPI-Driven Improvement Examples
Example 1: Declining Approval Rate
Data: Approval rate dropped from 92% to 78% over three months
Investigation: Analysis reveals 60% of rejections due to "insufficient information"
Action: Create order description template with required fields; train order creators on documentation standards
Result: Approval rate recovers to 88% within two months; rejection rate for insufficient information drops to 15%
Example 2: High Failed Notification Count
Data: Failed notifications increased from 2% to 8% suddenly
Investigation: Most failures concentrated with 3 vendors; all have same email domain
Action: Contact vendor organization; discover email server migration caused whitelist issue
Result: Vendor whitelists ARMOR email domain; failure rate returns to normal 2% within days
Related Articles
- 7/30-Day Trend Reports: Detailed analysis of trend reporting and period comparison
- Vendor Performance Analytics: Deep dive into vendor-specific metrics and evaluation
- Common Order Dashboards Explained: Guide to built-in ARMOR order dashboards and views
- Orders Not Sending to Vendor: Troubleshooting guide for failed notification issues
- Approval Emails Not Received: Resolving approval workflow communication problems
Summary
Understanding order KPIs is essential for effective order management administration. Key takeaways:
- Volume metrics (total orders, orders per period) indicate workload and growth trends
- Status metrics (pending count, status breakdown) reveal workflow health and bottlenecks
- Approval metrics (approval rate, time-to-approval) measure approval process efficiency
- Notification metrics (send success rate, failed count) track vendor communication effectiveness
- Vendor metrics (utilization, concentration) ensure balanced vendor relationships
- ARMOR does NOT track fulfillment, completion, or vendor performance after notification
- Regular KPI review and analysis drives continuous process improvement
- Combine multiple KPIs for comprehensive system health assessment
By monitoring these KPIs consistently and taking action on insights, administrators ensure their order management system operates efficiently and supports organizational maintenance objectives.
Tags: orders, analytics, kpis, reporting, metrics, performance, dashboards, status, approval, vendors
Was this article helpful?
That’s Great!
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry! We couldn't be helpful
Thank you for your feedback
Feedback sent
We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article